Insurers take cover to avoid capital crunch
Insurance survey: Global results
Insurance survey: Full results
Insurance survey: Use of alternative risk transfer
Respondents who use alternative methods of risk transfer: | 32% |
Methods of self-insurance used: | |
Captive: | 40% |
Self-insurance: | 25% |
Hedge funds/derivatives: | 8% |
Risk retention groups: | 12% |
Other/unsure | 15% |
What percentage of your risk transfer is provided by alternative market mechanisms? | |
Less than 30% | 53% |
30-50% | 12% |
50-70% | 12% |
More than 70% | 11% |
Did not say: | 12% |
Which type of insurance do they specifically cover? | |
Property | 40% |
Workers compensation | 5% |
Directors & officers liability | 2% |
Employers liability | 5% |
Professional indemnity | 2% |
Transport | 3% |
Marine | 2% |
Terrorism | 2% |
Health/casualty | 4% |
All risks | 10% |
Other/unspecified | 25% |
Which company set up and manages your alternative risk transfer mechanisms ? | |
1 | Marsh |
2 | Aon |
3 | Jardine Lloyd Thompson |
4 | Willis |
5 | Mapfre |
Do you expect your use of alternative risk transfer methods to increase or decrease in the next five to 10 years? | |
Increase | 58% |
Decrease | 3% |
Stay the same | 39% |
If you do not use an alternative mechanism, why not? | |
No need | 90% |
Other: | 10% |
Examples of other reasons: | |
1 | “It’s cheaper to use internal brokers and connections” |
2 | “The standard methods are the most secure” |
3 | “We have a very conservative management” |