Risky business: Is securities restructuring the answer to problem portfolios?

Euromoney Limited, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236090

4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Euromoney Limited 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Risky business: Is securities restructuring the answer to problem portfolios?

For some it’s the reinvention of structured finance, for others it marks the return of the bad old days. Is the recent increase in the use of securitization as a risk-management tool shifting the log jam of credit portfolios on banks’ balance sheets? Alex Chambers finds out.

Risky business: Is securities restructuring the answer to problem portfolios?

Restructurers roll boulders uphill

Synthetic restructuring a question of price

Restructuring: How not to do it


rocket-color-03.gif

WHERE THERE’S MUCK there’s brass goes the old English saying. There is plenty of mess to be cleaned up in the financial markets right now. And various intermediaries are eyeing the substantial potential profits to be had from helping to clean it all up. But this activity is more important than the opportunity it gives these players to make a fast buck. Attending to financial institutions’ economic accounting issues, lack of capital and parlous liquidity positions as a result of their deteriorating credit portfolios is one of the most urgent challenges the markets and wider economy face. As a result balance sheets are being restructured using a range of techniques, but most notably the financial markets’ bogeyman – securitization.

A close examination of the methods being used to solve banks’ problems shows that structured finance is not dead. However, the rationale for its use has been turned on its head. Instead of trying to extract as much yield as possible from portfolios of credit risk, the approach is now highly defensive.


Gift this article