Macaskill on markets: Naming rights and wrongs

Euromoney Limited, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236090

4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Euromoney Limited 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Macaskill on markets: Naming rights and wrongs

As electronic trading is dragged blinking into the sunlight, more careful name choices for platforms and systems might be a good idea, if only from a public relations standpoint.

Jon Macaskill is one of the leading capital markets and derivatives journalists, with over 20 years’ experience covering financial markets from London and New York. Most recently he worked at one of the biggest global investment banks

Jon Macaskill is one of the leading capital markets and derivatives journalists, with over 20 years’ experience covering financial markets from London and New York. Most recently he worked at one of the biggest global investment banks

Defining equity block trading facilities as dark pools could hardly have been calculated to give a worse impression of the new venues, with connotations of secrecy and possibly malign intent.

Early names for algorithmic trading systems did not project a commitment to market stability or fair play either. Credit Suisse dubbed two of its systems Guerrilla and Sniper, while Deutsche Bank plumped for Stealth.

The industry has demonstrated a preference for ill-judged product names across different asset classes.

US hedge funds and trading firms based away from Wall Street have an odd tendency to choose names that appear to be designed to be scary. Wolverine Trading is a Chicago-based proprietary dealer and execution agent that boasts on its website of its "unwavering integrity". It seems a pity it chose a name that evokes uncontrolled aggression instead.

Gift this article