![pipeline-Europe-flag-gas-iStock-960.jpg](https://assets.euromoneydigital.com/dims4/default/4d48d5d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/960x640+0+0/resize/800x533!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fd8%2F1c%2Fa25e8f3342b191b4917dd1273ca6%2Fpipeline-europe-flag-gas-istock-960.jpg)
Two months ahead of the US midterm elections, US red-state governors are riding a wave of legal attacks at pro-ESG banks and asset managers. The governors state that fund managers have a fiduciary duty to maximize profit for their investors, and that socially responsible investment (SRI) policies limiting exposure to fossil fuels betray this commitment.
Will we see a similar trend in Europe? Unlikely. Europe now faces transformational demand for alternatives to Russian gas, which has changed the ESG discourse firmly to favour co-existence over exclusion.
In the US, the states of Texas and West Virginia are boycotting several European banks – including BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse and Danske Bank – based on their ESG policies towards energy investments. Similar moves in Idaho, Louisiana, Kansas and Wyoming mean that the list could get longer as climate change becomes a more partisan issue in the country.
Unlike in the US, Europe’s oil and gas producers have a leading role in the conversation around transition
It is not impossible to imagine a similar situation in Europe. Politically powerful fossil-fuel companies are profiting from the continent’s sharply changed energy needs.