Securities market should not settle for failure

Euromoney Limited, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236090

4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Euromoney Limited 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Securities market should not settle for failure

T+1 settlement in Europe might be two years away, but market participants should be automating processes and removing friction in settlement systems now to minimise failed trades.

hourglass-clock-timer-iStock-960.jpg
Photo: iStock

In its assessment of the shortening of the settlement cycle in the EU, published in mid-November, European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) recommended that the European single market should move to T+1 in Q4 2027 and referenced October 11, 2027, as the optimal date for transition to T+1 in the EU.

ESMA’s statement that “a coordinated approach across Europe is desirable” appears to have been heeded in the UK, where this month the country’s Accelerated Settlement Taskforce (AST) recommended that the UK coordinate its move to a T+1 settlement cycle for securities on that 2027 date, in line with European counterparts.

Michele-Pitts-Citi-Securities-Services-960.jpg
Michele Pitts, Citi Investor Services

Given that, until the adoption of the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) in 2014, the length of the securities settlement cycle was not even harmonised in the EU, these are significant developments.

ESMA acknowledges that moving to next-day settlement requires improvements to be made to avoid increasing operational risks, which could otherwise translate into an increase in settlement fails.

It specifically refers to the automation of processes such as trade confirmations, allocations and matching leading to reduced error rates.


Gift this article