What we, in 2008, called an L-shaped recession, and what Pimco, in 2009, called the “new normal”, (both concepts long denied by official entities), has now been recognised as correct description by the Fed. A mere “L” might actually be optimistic as the economy moves so close to “W”, i.e. a new recession. Stock markets stopped declining after the Fed announcement but the respite was short lived. The recovery of the sovereign bonds in the euro zone appears to be a little firmer. The alleged change of policy of the Fed in announcing at least two years of low interest rates is only a confirmation of what has long seemed obvious, viz, that the short-end rate is anchored near zero. If this announcement provides a new base for even a modest “new normal”, the world can rejoice. |
|
Switzerland is helpless in front of the tsunami of funds seeking a haven. There are likely plans afoot to introduce taxes and/or negative interest rates on CHF accounts held by foreigners, but the CHF will return to reasonable levels only when faith in the EUR returns. That can happen only with federalisation dominated by Germany. That may please no one, not even the Germans, but there is no alternative. |
|
The reluctance of the German parliament to support centralised fiscal structures, or to let them grow to a dimension commensurate with the problems posed by Italy and Spain, has meant that the ECB has had to act in ways beyond its basic remit. The parallel with the USA is striking: the Treasury has proven incapable of appropriate fiscal policies, so the Fed has tried – with limited success – to use monetary measures to prime the economy. |
|
Both the Fed and the ECB (in buying Italian and other sovereign debt) are practising quantitative easing. However, the parallel breaks down with regard to motive. The Fed is trying to revive a broken economy; the ECB is seeking to save the EMU. We see the ECB moves as one leg of the coming federalisation, the other being a euro zone ministry of finance. |
|
We have recently questioned the possibility of growth and austerity going hand in hand. The UK illustrates the point. Its austerity programme has reassured bond markets (AAA rating, CDS rates dropping below Germany’s!), but at the cost of dismal GDP growth and riots. The civil unrest will be brought under control, but is a clear signal to the Government that cutting police forces and community services has consequences beyond mere economics. |
|
Many aspects of the current bond market are a reminder of the period post-Lehman. Banks are reluctant to lend and distrust each other. Corporations can issue bonds, but have to pay rising coupon rates. Given the already high levels of cash on corporate balance sheets, and a reticence to invest, it is no wonder that few are choosing to return to the markets. |
|
The reluctance of corporations to borrow would provide an answer to the enigma of long-term interest rates not rising when governments are borrowing so heavily. We envisaged governments competing with the private sector for funds. However, given the parlous state of economy, it is little surprise that the private sector is choosing not to compete for funds. |
|
In the USA, a moral dimension is belatedly entering the arguments about indebtedness. Professor Kotlikoff of Boston University speaks of “generational balance” (or rather, imbalance) to describe how the current older generation is robbing the younger generation by leaving it with huge levels of debts. He suggests that the younger generation take serious action to stop the rot. While it is unlikely that the English rioters are listening to Kolikoff, their action illustrates his point all too well ! |
|
Market Focus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer |
August 10, 2011 |
Dr. Roy Damary |