<b>Simple execution vs risk-taking</b>
Euromoney Limited, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 15236090
4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Euromoney Limited 2024
Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

<b>Simple execution vs risk-taking</b>

Headline: Simple execution vs risk-taking
Source: Euromoney
Date: October 2001

       
Jennifer Berg
Programme trading takes two basic forms. The first approach is for banks and brokers simply to execute trades on behalf of their clients, acting as their agents in the marketplace and turning over most or all of the price benefits to the clients in return for a commission for doing the deal.

Alternatively, they can leverage their balance sheets, taking bulk trades onto their own books – assuming the attendant market risk – in an attempt to extract more benefit from their dealing expertise. Returns of this sort often exceed the commission they command for what amounts to providing the client with immediate execution.

The directions investors take (and the margins that banks make) – either for agency or risk trading – depend on many factors, from the level of hard-to-source securities included in a package to the desire of the client to execute a programme trade at speed. But the rising competition seen in recent years is altering the balance of the business.

“We have a higher percentage of agency business than we do of risk business,” says Tom Levy, a managing director and head of portfolio products at Morgan Stanley in London.









Gift this article