![Piyush-Gupta-2016-for-2018-R-600](https://assets.euromoneydigital.com/dims4/default/e1ae082/2147483647/strip/true/crop/600x421+0+0/resize/800x561!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F85%2F15%2F1e36d0855421b550091ae15ead75%2Fpiyush-gupta-2016-for-2018-r-600.gif)
DBS CEO Piyush Gupta
For some time now, DBS has delivered a convincing narrative: that its investments in technology and digital banking will drive the cost-income ratio down, making the bank more profitable.
Late last year, DBS calculated, and published, a methodology showing that a digitally engaged customer delivers a cost-to-income ratio fully 20 percentage points lower than traditional clients.
CEO Piyush Gupta has argued that the digital banking channel in India, digibank, ought to settle at a cost-income ratio around 30%, with Indonesia following a similar model, and that the whole bank should be heading in that direction.
Why, then, did DBS on Thursday report a fourth-quarter cost-income ratio of 44%, up from 41% in the previous quarter?
The answer is fairly simple, but it raises a bigger question.
The quick answer is the acquisition of ANZ’s wealth management businesses in Asia, announced in late 2016. The acquisition brought across S$11 billion of deposits and S$8 billion of loans by the end of 2017, but a book of business operating under quite different metrics than those that were prevalent at DBS.