![don_banner_column-780](https://assets.euromoneydigital.com/dims4/default/b862b13/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1920x943+0+0/resize/800x393!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F53%2F3b%2Fbb86da6a4ea29aedbac1f8d94130%2Fdominic-oneill-on-europe-1920px.jpg)
Opening a letter from Santander recently, for a moment I get a sense of the kind of popular outrage directed against London and its financial industry – even though the latter benefits me more than most.
My local bank branch, it seems, is closing.
I am subject to one of about 140 UK branch closures, about a fifth of the network, that Santander announced in January.
I picture the kind of boarded-up shopfront that is becoming all too familiar in the British high street. It’s a sad sight that will become more normal, I reflect, as the UK’s toxic political environment weighs more heavily on the economy and business investment: even if we avoid a disastrous no-deal Brexit.
The rage soon switches back to our politicians.
The next news I see is that shares are plummeting in Metro Bank. This is the challenger whose strategy is supposed to be a rare source of hope for those who want branches to remain a cornerstone of banks’ consumer businesses.
Metro’s sell-off is down to an accounting error over risks in its loan book, but also because of stubbornly low interest margins: made worse by a mortgage market now suffering from Brexit.