data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/289a7/289a7e570c9355b88f0708814d21b80e201b8a82" alt="Peter_Lee_banner_banking-780"
Andrea Enria, chair of the supervisory board of the ECB, gave a speech in London at the end of October celebrating some of the successes of banking union – establishment of a single supervisory mechanism for large banks, NPLs brought down from €1 trillion to €600 billion in the last five years – while also lamenting its failures, notably the lack of a European deposit insurance scheme.
Without this, a euro deposited in a country with weak banks might easily flee to a stronger bank in a different country at the first signs of stress. The single-currency project itself remains incomplete.
What a surprise then that one week later, Olaf Scholz, finance minister of Germany, the country regularly blamed for blocking such a scheme, should lay out in the FT his ideas for the completion of banking union, along with its so far missing third pillar.
Scholz actually calls not for a European deposit insurance scheme to replace national schemes but rather for a new European deposit reinsurance scheme to enhance those national arrangements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5772/c5772538ecc1e9519fe8ba219c0a4316d411e83f" alt="Olaf-Scholz-German-finance-R-780.gif"
Olaf Scholz, finance minister of Germany
In the event of a bank failure, the first resort for depositors would be to national insurance schemes; then, only if those funds are exhausted, to a European fund providing limited additional liquidity through repayable loans.