![Chris Wright on Asia 1920px.jpg](https://assets.euromoneydigital.com/dims4/default/373527a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1920x943+0+0/resize/800x393!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Feuromoney-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F2f%2Fbb%2F50413a0f419585277ebaafe7413a%2Fchris-wright-asia-1920px.jpg)
The agreement between Goldman Sachs and the Malaysian government over the US bank’s work with 1MDB has inspired a number of ‘Goldman settles for $3.9 billion’ headlines. There’s a bit more going on beneath the surface, and not everything is resolved.
1. What’s in a number?
The $3.9 billion number is not what Goldman will be paying. That figure is $2.5 billion. The other $1.4 billion refers to a guarantee that the government of Malaysia will receive that amount in proceeds from 1MDB assets that have been seized around the world.
So where does $2.5 billion come from?
It appears to have been thrashed out as a middle ground between the $4.5 billion the US Department of Justice believes was siphoned out of Malaysia’s public purse through 1MDB, the $7.5 billion the Malaysian government has previously claimed it wants, and a figure below $2 billion that former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad says Goldman had previously offered to settle the matter.
![]() |
Lim Guan Eng says the settlement is too low |
Over the weekend of July 25/26, there were already complaints led by Democratic Action Party secretary general and former minister of finance Lim Guan Eng that the settled amount was too low.